Animal rights, an Uncommon card

The card carries these facts from its Wikipedia article.

• The argument from marginal cases is often used to reach this conclusion.
• This argument holds that if human beings such as infants, senile people, and the cognitively disabled are granted moral status and negative rights, then nonhuman animals must be granted the same moral consideration, since animals do not lack any known morally relevant characteristic that marginal-case humans have.
• Broadly speaking, and particularly in popular discourse, the term "animal rights" is often used synonymously with "animal protection" or "animal liberation".

Rarity in WikiCards follows a year of Wikipedia page views: the most read articles become Epic and Legendary cards. The Animal rights article was read about 79,000 times in a year. ATK comes from the length of the article and DEF from its quality, so this card hits with 84 and blocks with 92: each hit it takes is cut by 37 %.

Open packs. Each pack holds five cards drawn from real Wikipedia articles, the rarest last, and the fifth card is always Rare or better. The odds are shown in the game. A free pack arrives every hour and two can wait, and the Coins you win in duels buy more packs.

The cards just above and just below Animal rights in the power ranking, all domains together.